Sulzer-Vogt Machine Co. v. Rushville Water Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From Rush Circuit Court; L. J. Kirkpatrick, Special Judge. Suit by the Sulzer-Vogt Machine Company against the Rushville Water Company and others for the enforcement of a mechanic’s lien. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. ' Transferred from Appellate Court, under clause 2, §1337j Burns 1901.
1Opinion of the CourtGillett, J.
Appellant sought to assert and foreclose a mechanic’s lien against the property of appellee for money due said appellant, as a subcontractor for the ITowe Pump & Engine Company, because of the furnishing, at the latter’s request, of boilers, fixtures, etc., for the power-house of appellee. A demurrer was filed by appellant to the second paragraph of appellee’s answer, that was addressed to the second paragraph of appellant’s cross-complaint. An assignment of error is based on said ruling. We proceed to consider, since the demurrer searched the record, whether said paragraph of cross-complaint…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Warner v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Willis v. Eastern Trust & Banking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Goodbub v. Estate of HornungIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- McElwaine v. HoseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Jenckes v. JenckesIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McDaniel v. OsbornIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- National Supply Co. v. StranahanIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Fitch v. Jones & Lamson MacHine Co. (In Re Jones & Lamson MacHine Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
- Chapman-Stein Co. v. Lippincott Glass Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1928
- Herron v. Whitely Malleable Castings Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.