Legal Opinion

Goodbub v. Estate of Hornung

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1891No. 15,676PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, J.

Appellant filed a claim against the estate represented by the appellee, reciting its nature and origin, and asking to have it allowed as a preferred claim.

The administrator, by an entry on the margin of the appearance docket, allowed .it as a “general and unpreferred claim.” ,

The estate was afterwards found to be insolvent, and ordered to be settled accordingly.

In due time the administrator filed his final report, and -caused notice to be given of the time set for its hearing.

When the report came up for hearing appellant appeared ■and filed a written petition, reciting the filing of said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shepard v. Milwaukee Gas Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Buser v. ShepardIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Fickle v. SneppIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Blankenbaker v. Bank of CommerceIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Jenkins v. JenkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Daniels v. BruceIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Wilson v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  3. Diaz v. DuncanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Manchester v. PopkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Garneau v. Port Blakely Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API