Legal Opinion
Commercial Nat. Bank of Los Angeles v. Catron
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 1, 1931No. 409PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COTTERAL, Circuit Judge.
The Commerical National Bank of Los Angeles appeals from a judgment of dismissal on demurrer to an amended complaint, in a suit it brought against John W. Catron and Virginia P. Catron, on two promissory notes, dated at Los Angeles, Cal., May 24, 1923, payable with interest and attorneys’ fees to plaintiff at its banking house in that city. The first cause of action declared on a note for $5,000, credited with $87.50 as interest, and a further payment of $1,664.25, disclosing on its face that it was secured by a trust deed of real property. The second was on a note for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Edwards v. Bates CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Schunk v. Moline, Milburn & Stoddart Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Martin v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Weber v. McClevertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Yates v. Whyel Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kimel v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- First State Bank v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Emland Builders, Inc., a Corporation, M. B. Landau and Ed Landau v. Barney T. SheaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Bayside-Flushing Gardens, Inc. v. BeuermannDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1941
- Martin v. MidgettArizona Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.