Legal Opinion

Huyvaerts v. Roedtz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1919No. 15112PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clarke county, Back, J., entered February 4, 1918, upon findings in favor of the defendants, dismissing a garnishment, upon overruling plaintiff’s demurrer to a complaint in intervention.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The plaintiff, Henry Huyvaerts recovered judgment against the defendant Andre Roedtz, and thereafter caused a writ of garnishment to he issued and served upon one O. F. Johnson. The garnishee answered the writ to the effect that he had certain funds in his possession which were the property of Emma Roedtz, the wife of the defendant Andre Roedtz. This affidavit was controverted. Mrs. Roedtz filed a complaint in intervention, to which the plaintiff demurred. The demurrer being overruled, the plaintiff elected to stand thereon and refused to plead further. Judgment was entered discharging the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schramm v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. La Selle v. WooleryWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Escrow Service Co. v. CresslerWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Achilles v. HoopesWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Maag v. VoykovichWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Meng v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API