Legal Opinion

Achilles v. Hoopes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1952No. 32011PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.

The question presented by this case is whether the community or separate character of a promissory note, executed by the husband alone, is determined by the law of the place where it was made or by the law of the place where it was payable.

The defendants are husband and wife and have been such at all times material to this case. In 1948, their family home was in Seattle, Washington. During June of that year, defendant husband went to Coos Bay, Oregon, to work, and his wife remained in Seattle. October 5, 1948, while in Oregon, the husband made and delivered his promissory note to plaintiff.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. La Selle v. WooleryWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Clark v. EltingeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Crawford v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Huyvaerts v. RoedtzWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Meng v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Baffin Land Corp. v. MONTICELLO MOT. INN., INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Van Dyke v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Escrow Service Co. v. CresslerWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Casa Del Rey v. HartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  5. Maag v. VoykovichWashington Supreme Court · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API