Legal Opinion

Eastman v. Eastman-Veres

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 18, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANA Justice.

[¶ 1] Walter Eastman and Gloria Eastman-Veres both appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Fritzsche, J.) denying their motions to modify their divorce judgment (Cumberland County, Scolnik, J.). Walter contends that the parties’ financial circumstances do not support the court’s order that he continue to pay alimony, medical expenses, and the taxes and insurance on Gloria’s home. Gloria asserts that the court erred when it refused to increase Walter’s alimony obligation, order Walter to pay more than $10,000 for her future surgery, and award her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Page v. PageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Harding v. MurraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. Parker-Danner Co. v. NickersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. Schultz v. DellaireSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dargie v. DargieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Dow v. AdamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. Dargie v. DargieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API