Legal Opinion

Heilig v. Wyoming Game & Fish Commission

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2003No. 02-41PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Daniel Heilig, an attorney and avid hunter, filed a pro se declaratory judgment action in the Ninth Judicial District Court asserting Chapter 2, Section 12 of the Wyoming Game and Fish Department’s (Game and Fish) general hunting regulations was null and void, unenforceable, and invalid ab initio because Game and Fish had not complied with the Wyoming Administrative Procedure Act (Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 16-3-101 to -115 (LexisNexis 2001)) (WAPA) in incorporating its 2000 Walk-In Areas Hunting publication (Atlas) by reference into its rules and regulations. Prior to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Holly Sugar Corp. v. FritzlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Jolley v. State Loan & Investment BoardWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Reiman Corp. v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Reserve InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. William F. West Ranch, LLC v. TyrrellWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Armstrong v. HrabalWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Voss v. GoodmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In Re Estate of DrwenskiWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Hoy v. DRM, INC.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API