Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 27, 2014No. 46/13Published

1Opinion of the Court

Wardell Monroe Brooks v. State of Maryland No. 46, September Term 2013 Evidence - Impeachment of Witness - Prior Inconsistent Statement. To impeach a witness with extrinsic evidence of a prior allegedly inconsistent oral statement, a party must satisfy the conditions set forth in Maryland Rule 5-613. If the only extrinsic evidence offered is a written summary of the prior oral statement, it must be a substantially verbatim version of the oral statement unless the witness who made the oral statement has previously adopted or ratified the writing as an accurate summary of the prior oral…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Danial Siebert v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. State v. ReidTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Aromatique, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Gold Seal, Inc., and Darrell Bufford, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. State v. MoranArizona Supreme Court · 1986

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API