Cosgrove v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BAKES, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs Linda Winfree and her daughter, Sally Cosgrove, sued defendant Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Merrell Dow), for birth defects suffered by Cosgrove, allegedly as a result of Winfree’s ingestion of the “anti-morning sickness” drug, Bendectin, during her pregnancy. This is one of a series of Bendectin cases filed nationwide. Summary judgment was granted for defendant on Winfree’s individual claims because the I.C. § 5-219(4) 2-year statute of limitations had run. The claims of infant Cosgrove, however, were not barred by the statute of limitations, and those…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Bendectin Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Stephens v. StearnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Jefferey Dale Ellis, Administrator of the Estate of Margaret Ann Ellis, Deceased v. International Playtex, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bailey v. KhourySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Turpin v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Taylor v. AIA Services Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Le'Gall v. Lewis CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- Jeremiah v. Yanke MacHine Shop, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.