Metz v. Sarandos
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.
— Appellants Delores Sarandos and the Law Offices of Leonard W Moen appeal the trial court’s grant of respondent Julia Metz’ motion to reconsider and reversal of its earlier order granting summary judgment in their favor. Sarandos argues that the trial court erred by: (1) granting the motion to reconsider when it was not timely *358filed; (2) accepting ethics expert David Boerner’s letter when it does not satisfy the requirements for expert testimony; and (3) reversing summary judgment because Metz did not create a material issue of fact on all the elements of malpractice.
We reverse.
FACTS
As a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schaefco, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Moore v. WentzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kaech v. Lewis County PUDCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Kaech v. Lewis County Public Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- In Re Marriage of KnutsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- In re the Marriage of KnutsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- In re the Marriage of: Ellen Doneen and James DoneenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.