Legal Opinion · Dissent

Messner v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists, International Union of America, Local 256

California Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1960No. L. A. 25288Published

1Dissent

*889SCHAUER, J., Dissenting.

The majority today present the second installment of the ambitious project undertaken by them in Petri Cleaners, Inc., v. Automotive Employees, etc., Local No. 88 (1960), ante, p. 455 [2 Cal.Rptr. 470, 349 P.2d 76]. “The crucial issue in this case,” say the majority (ante, p. 877), “is whether a closed or union shop agreement is a proper objective of a labor union that does not represent any of the employees directly involved.” This brief declaration appears, on further reading of the opinion, to be somewhat of an oversimplification of the problems involved.

A more…

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API