Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1964No. 6 Div. 4PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

The Honorable Court of Appeals

Re: Your questions propounded to this Court, February 24, 1964 with reference to § 4 of Act No. 526 of September 16, 1963.

While some of your questions are not pertinent to the pending case, to each question our answer is “No”.

All the Justices concur in the foregoing; but LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON, GOODWYN and MERRILL, JJ., think the following explanation should be made.

We think it is a matter of common knowledge that Act No. 526, approved September 16, 1963, was enacted by the Legislature to enable the courts of this state to comply with recent decisions of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Irvin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Sanders v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Hobson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Brinks v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Cottingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API