Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Hultgren

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This action was instituted by M. D. Chandler, receiver of Diamond Motor Parts Company, a Minnesota corporation, to recover from the defendant Gust Hultgren, alleged to be a stockholder of Diamond Motor Parts Company, an assessment ordered levied and collected, by the United States district court for Minnesota, sixth division. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the defendant appeals.

There are two main questions here involved, to wit-: (1) Did the circuit court of the state of Oregon for Multnomah county err in refusing to allow the defendant to file an amended answer on appeal to that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Chandler v. PeketzSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Buchtel v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Sterrett v. Stoddard Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Jackson v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lambert Pharmacal Co. v. Roberts Bros.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API