Yates v. . Yates
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by plaintiff from Shaw, at March Term, 1915, of Randolph. Civil action. The nature of the case, the verdict, and the facts relevant to the exception presented will sufficiently appear in his Honor’s judgment, which is as follows: This cause coming on for trial at March Term, 1915, of Randolph Superior Court, Hon. T. J. Shaw, judge, presiding.
Read the full summary
Appeal by plaintiff from Shaw, at March Term, 1915, of Randolph. Civil action. The nature of the case, the verdict, and the facts relevant to the exception presented will sufficiently appear in his Honor’s judgment, which is as follows: This cause coming on for trial at March Term, 1915, of Randolph Superior Court, Hon. T. J. Shaw, judge, presiding. A jury having been chosen, sworn, and impaneled to try the issues submitted to them, who have answered the same in favor of the plaintiff, as follows: What amount, if any, is the defendant Louisa Tates indebted to the plaintiff? Answer: Yes; $210.…
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.
Our statute on tbe question of costs in civil cases, now chapter 22 of Eevisal, secs. 1264, 1266, and 1267, formerly Code of ’83, ch. 10, secs. 525, 526, and 527, among other things, provides, see. 1264:
1. That costs shall be allowed as of course to plaintiff in the following case.s: In actions to recover real property or a claim for title thereto arising on the pleadings or are certified to have been in question at the trial.
2. In actions to recover personal property.
3. In actions of which a court of a justice of the peace has no jurisdiction, unless otherwise provided by law.
Sections 4 and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Owens v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Williams v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Gulley v. . MacYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Cook v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Parton v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hoskins v. HoskinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Foreclosure of a Lien by Ridgeloch Homeowners Ass'n v. McNeillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Ritchie v. . RitchieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- VanDyke v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Hare v. . HareSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.