Legal Opinion

Haggard v. Jackson

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided March 31, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00159Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION JAMES HAGGARD, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:19-cv-159 DRL-MGG JAMES JACKSON, M.D., Defendant. OPINION & ORDER Pending before the court are two motions. Dr. James Jackson filed a summary judgment motion claiming that James Haggard failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

claim. Mr. Haggard filed a motion for the court to reconsider its screening order (issued June 21, 2019) specific to his medical malpractice claim. For the following reasons, the court grants Dr. Jackson’s summary…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API