Legal Opinion

Martin v. Walsenburg Fuel Co.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided September 3, 1912No. 5,882Published

At Law. Action by Clara Martin and Alexander Levy against the Walsenburg > Fuel Company.

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, District Judge.

The ground upon which the demurrer proceeds is that the complaint fails to allege certain matters pro*271vided for in the lease, embodied) in full in the complaint,, and which it is claimed are necessary to a complete cause of action by the plaintiff, it is urged that the complaint, to be complete, should set forth that the Robinson vein of coal has not been exhausted, and it is further claimed that the complaint should disclose that the mining of coal from the demised) premises has not been “prevented by fire, explosion, or other unavoidable casualty.”

The first of these…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDowell v. HendrixIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Williams v. PhielSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  3. Wilson v. Beech Creek Cannel Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API