Legal Opinion

Chappell Chemical & Fertilizer Co. v. Sulphur Mines Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 9, 1899No. 1; 91PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna

This is a suit in equity to restrain the enforcement of a certain writ of attachment and execution issued on a judgment recovered against plaintiff in error. The original bill alleges that the judgment is absolutely void. The following are some of its allegations:

“ That the said purported judgment was recovered by the said defendant against your orator in the superior court for .Baltimore city, before the' judge at large, and that said judgment is rendered coram non judice, and your orator herewith files a certified copy of the docket entries in said case, marked £ Complainants’ Exhibit B,’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Long Island Water Supply Co. v. BrooklynSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Eustis v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Iowa Central Railway Co. v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. California Powder Works v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago & Erie R. R. v. EbersoleSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Post Printing & Publishing Co. v. ShafrothSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Zavelo v. Leichtman, Goodman & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API