Legal Opinion
Microprocessor Enhancement Corp. v. Texas Instruments Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 1, 2008No. 2007-1249, 2007-1286PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
This is a patent infringement case. Microprocessor Enhancement Corporation and Michael H. Branigin (collectively “MEC”) appeal the judgments of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Docket Nos. 05-CV-00323 and 05-CV05667, wherein the district court found on summary judgment that Texas Instruments Incorporated (“TI”) and Intel Corporation (“Intel”) did not infringe any claim of U.S. Patent No. 5,471,593 (“the '593 patent”) owned by MEC and that all claims of the patent are invalid for indefiniteness. Because the district court…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- C.R. Bard, Inc. And Davol Inc. v. United States Surgical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Basf Corporation v. Johnson Matthey Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Voda v. Cordis Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Katz v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sprint Communication CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.