Legal Opinion
Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sprint Communication Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 23, 2016No. 2016-1013PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
*1226PROST, Chief Judge.
Sprint Communication Company LP and its affiliates (collectively, “Sprint”) appeal from a final decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware finding that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,452,932; 6,463,052; 6,633,561; 7,286,561; 6,298,064; and 6,473,429 (collectively, “the asserted patents”) are invalid as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2. Because “processing system” does not prevent the claims, read in light of the specification and the prosecution history, from…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Richard Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Berkheimer v. Hp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Sonix Technology Co., Ltd. v. Publications InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Basf Corporation v. Johnson Matthey Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Exmark Manufacturing Co. v. Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Zeroclick, LLC v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.