Legal Opinion · Dissent

Finley v. National Endowment for the Arts

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 5, 1996No. Nos. 92-56028, 92-56387 and 92-55089Published

1DissentKleinfeld, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

First Amendment law has taken some odd turns lately. We now live in a legal context prohibiting display of a cross or menorah on government property. American Jewish Congress v. City of Beverly Hills, 90 F.3d 379 (9th Cir.1996), Separation of Church and State Committee v. City of Eugene, 93 F.3d 617 (9th Cir.1996). But if a cross is immersed in urine, a government grant cannot be withheld on the ground that the art would offend general standards of decency and respect for the religious beliefs of most Americans. The government, under today’s decision, cannot even…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API