Legal Opinion
Watson Wyatt Corp. v. SBC Holdings, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 30, 2006No. CIV.05-71473PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Petitioner moves for judgment on its petition to compel arbitration under 9 U.S.C. § 4, the Federal Arbitration Act. For the reasons below, I GRANT in part and DENY in part the petition.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Petitioner Watson Wyatt Corp. (Watson Wyatt) sells actuarial and consulting services. (Pet. ¶ 3; Answer ¶ 3.) Defendant SBC Holdings, Inc. (SBC) is the sponsor of a pension plan for the employees of the former Stroh’s Brewery Company. (Pet. ¶ 4, 8, Answer ¶ 4, 8.) From 1997 1 through…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Wesco Distribution, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Giles v. University of ToledoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007