Legal Opinion

Kimball v. Northern Electric Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1911No. Sac. No. 1769PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Charles W. Slack, A. M. Seymour, and W. H. Carlin, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

This is an action for damages for injuries received in a collision between two of defendant’s trains. The court, sitting without a jury, gave judgment in favor of plaintiff for forty-one hundred dollars and costs of suit. From this judgment and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial defendant appeals.

The appellant corporation was operating an electric line between Sacramento and Chico. The ears were moved generally by an electric current introduced through a third rail, but in cities and villages the “trolley system” was used. The “trolley zone” through the village of Live…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. LoperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Robinson v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. People v. MahatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Kline v. Santa Barbara Etc. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Sim v. WeeksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Daniels v. CelesteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Call v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Ingebretsen v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API