Legal Opinion
Bildoc, Inc. v. Chicago Housing Authority
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 9, 1989No. 87 C 3494Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant’s, Chicago Housing Authority (“CHA”), motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's, Bildoc, Inc. (“Bildoc”) complaint. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a summary judgment “shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- South Suburban Safeway Lines, Inc. v. Regional Transportation AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Anthony Malcak v. The Westchester Park DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.