Legal Opinion

Young v. Buck

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 12, 1916No. 19,794PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Allen district court; Oscar Foust, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:(1) In the original opinion in this case it was said that an action in the nature of a creditor’s bill can not be brought until the claim on which it is based is reduced to judgment, but that suit on the original demand — that is, the eifort to put it in judgment — must be begun within a reasonable time after the discovery of the fraud, not exceeding two years. It was assumed, without further discussion, that the period of limitation (with respect to actions for relief on the ground of fraud) did not run during the pendency of an action the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Williams v. Commercial National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Atchison Grain Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Tennent v. BatteySupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. Finch v. KentMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Rose v. DunkleeColorado Court of Appeals · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lowell-Woodward Hardware Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1928
  3. Stephon v. TopicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Kinnard v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. LemleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API