Finch v. Kent
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Yellowstone County; C. 3. Loud, Judge. Action by George R. Finch and others against Thomas Kent and wife. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, and from an order denying a new trial, defendants appeal. (Sumitted on briefs, without oral argument.)
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pigott
This action, in the nature of a creditors’ bill, was brought to set aside, as fraudulent and void, a sale of 3,4:00 sheep made by the defendant Thomas Kent to the defendant Mary Kent on the 3d day of January, 1893.
*270The complaint states that on the 3d day of January, 1893, the defendant Thomas Kent, being then the owner of the sheep, sold them to his wife, the defendant Mary Kent; that the sale was fraudulent, without any consideration, and void as against the plaintiffs and the other creditors of Thomas, and was made for the purpose of hindering, delaying and defrauding his-creditors; that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Sanford v. Gates, Townsend & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
- Power v. LenoirMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- Griswold v. BoleyMontana Supreme Court · 1872
- Weaver v. . HavilandNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Freeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Montana Ore Purchasing Co. v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
- Kipp v. SilvermanMontana Supreme Court · 1901
- Stolte v. KarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Conley v. ConleyMontana Supreme Court · 1932
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.