Legal Opinion

Hauser v. Stoddard

California Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1937No. Sac. 5112PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of distribution by which the entire estate was distributed to the heirs at law of the decedent.

The appellant E. T. Stoddard is not an heir but claims a share in the estate under the terms of a document claimed to be the will of the decedent and admitted to probate on May 27, 1932. Within due time W. J. Linstead, a brother of the decedent, filed a contest of the purported will on the ground of forgery. A trial of the contest resulted in a judgment setting aside the order admitting the document to probate and revoking the order appointing an administratrix with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kearney v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Linstead v. StoddardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Samson v. SamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Scott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Estate of PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Voyce v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Estate of MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Estate of SandersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Burford v. HartmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Syster v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API