Legal Opinion

Samson v. Samson

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1883PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The appellant, Jacob Z. Davis, intervened in the proceeding, claiming an interest in a certain portion of the real estate, by virtue of the lien of a judgment against Mrs. Fannie M. Samson. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment made and entered ¡Nov. 26, 1880, revoking the probate of a will which had been admitted to probate in the year 1870. The revocation was had upon proceedings initiated on the 26th of July, 1880, by and on behalf of a minor child of the deceased, under and by-virtue of that provision of the statute which saves to infants and persons of unsound mind a period of one year after their respective disabilities are removed within which to contest the validity of a will. The deceased left surviving him a widow and four minor children. Shortly after his death the widow…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bailey v. StewartNew York Surrogate's Court · 1876

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Voyce v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. In Re the Will of CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Lewark v. DoddIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Clements v. McGinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Scott v. McGirthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API