Legal Opinion
Milz & Cie v. Bloomfield
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
The plaintiff is suing for the price of goods ordered by the defendant, delivered to him and alleged to have been accepted. It was found at the trial that the goods were improperly packed in Europe, and as a result when they arrived at the buyer’s city, New York, they were in large part unmerchantable. The defendant at the trial claimed a rescission. The question reserved for determination is whether the buyer notified the seller within a reasonable time of bis election to rescind.
The goods although not perishable were seasonable merchandise. They were Easter hats, and apparently of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Henry Glass & Co. v. MisrochNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Schnitzer v. LangNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Knobel v. J. Bartel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Silberstein v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Kaufmann v. LevyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sherkate Sahami Khass Rapol v. Henry R. Jahn & Son, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Dailey Mills, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1951