Legal Opinion
Schnitzer v. Lang
New York Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 1924PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCardozo, J.
On June 11, 1919, plaintiff and defendants made a contract in writing by which plaintiff agreed to buy and defendants to sell 78 pieces of silk at the price of $1.60 per yard. The quality was to be number 1,000, a description adopted by the defendants and peculiar to their business.. The colors were to be distributed among the total yardage in designated proportions. Delivery was to be as soon as possible, beginning in' July and to be completed by November 1. The plaintiff bought the goods for use in his business, which was that of a manufacturer of shirts.
As to many of the facts, there is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Doane v. DunhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- American Steam Gauge & Valve Manufacturing Co. v. Mechanics Iron Foundry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- M & M Co. v. Hood Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
3Cited by19 opinions
- N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Columbia Axle Co. v. American Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Henry Glass & Co. v. MisrochNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Massari v. Accurate Bushing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Sherkate Sahami Khass Rapol v. Henry R. Jahn & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.