Legal Opinion
California Pro-Life Council, Inc. v. Randolph
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 14, 2007No. 05-15507PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
California Pro-Life Council, Inc. (CPLC) challenges certain provisions of California’s Political Reform Act (PRA), including the PRA’s definition of “contribution” and the recipient committee requirements imposed on a multi-purpose organization, such as CPLC. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Appellees (collectively referred to as California) and denied CPLC’s motion for summary judgment. Because strict scrutiny applies and CPLC conceded the existence of a compelling governmental interest in the disclosure…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Human Life of Washington, Inc. v. Chair Bill BrumsickleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Berger v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- North Carolina Right to Life, Inc. v. LeakeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Canyon Ferry Road Baptist Church of East Helena, Inc. v. UnsworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Family Pac v. Rob McKennaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.