Gibson v. National Park Bank
The Superior Court of New York City
Cross-appeals from judgment entered upon a report of a referee. The defendant appeals from the whole judgment. The plaintiffs appeal from that part of the judgment which denies them a portion of their claim. The facts sufficiently appear in the referee’s opinion as follows:
1Opinion of the Court
Hamilton Cole, Referee.
—“This case was formerly tried under the name of Bills v. National Park Bank. The complaint was dismissed, and the judgment entered thereon, was affirmed by the general term of this court (47 Super. Ct. 302). The court of appeals reversed this judgment and ordered a new trial (89 N. Y. 343). An assignment was. made of the cause of action to the present plaintiff Gibson, and he has been substituted as a party herein.
“ The evidence in the case, as it now stands, does not-substantially differ from that given upon the former trial, and a full statement of the case is given…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Thurber v. . BlanckNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Cruger v. . DoughertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Powell v. . TuttleNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Lynch v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.