Legal Opinion
Rose v. Cahee
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 22, 2010No. 2:09-cr-00142PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Melody Rose (“Rose”) brings this action alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq., the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq., and Wisconsin statutes § 106.52 and § 252.14. Rose’s claims stem from the alleged refusal of defendant Dr. Steven Cahee (“Dr. Cahee”) to perform gallbladder surgery on Rose because she is infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The three defendants filed two separate motions for summary judgment that are now before the court. Defendants…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Reed v. Columbia St. Mary's Hosp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Smith v. BunkleySuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
- Reed v. Columbia St. Mary's HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2017
- In Re Covid-Related Restrictions On Religious ServicesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2022
- Linda Reed v. Columbia St. Mary's HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.