Legal Opinion

In Re the Tax Appeal of Brookings Associates v. South Dakota State Board of Equalization

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1992No. 17461PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, Justice

(on reassignment).

PROCEDURAL HISTORY/ISSUE

Brookings Associates (Associates), a partnership, contests the assessed valuation imposed upon its property by Brook-ings County Director of Equalization, Be-ryle Sessions (assessor). Associates initially appealed to the Brookings County Board of Equalization, which did not change assessor’s revised assessed valuation of $1,477,465.00. Associates next appealed to the State Board of Equalization, which affirmed the County Board. Associates then appealed to the circuit court for Brookings County, pursuant to SDCL 10-11-43 (1989). The court affirmed the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Herbert J. Roberts v. Norman M. Ross, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  2. Yadco, Inc. v. Yankton CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. McKiver v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Vetter v. VetterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Skinner v. New Mexico State Tax CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Richter Enterprises, Inc. v. Sully CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Town Square Limited Partnership v. Clay County Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Amert v. Lake County Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Stehly v. Davison CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Fall River County v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API