Legal Opinion
Wittenberg v. Fidelity Bank, N.A.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 22, 1992No. 70226PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALMA WILSON, Justice:
The appellee was granted summary judgment in an action filed by the appellants for economic duress, breach of contract and detrimental reliance. The Journal Entry of Judgment found that no substantial controversy existed regarding any material fact and based its judgment on “the reasons set forth in [appellee’s] brief.” The Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of the first cause of action as to Plaintiff Bookman and the second and third causes of action. But the court reversed and remanded the first cause of action. This Court grants certiorari for the limited purpose…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Centric Corp. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Associates Transports, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Great Western Motor Lines, Inc. v. CozardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Barnett v. BodleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jennings v. BadgettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- All Comp Construction Co. v. FordCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- Fossil Creek Energy v. Cook's OilfieldCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Jadco Management Corp. v. Federal Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- Jadco Management Corp. v. Federal Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.