In re Opening Second Street & Third Street
New York Supreme Court
Motion to confirm the reports of commissioners of estimate and commissioner of assessment in a street opening proceeding.
1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.
This is the usual motion to confirm the reports of commissioners of estimate and the commissioner of assessment in a street opening proceeding. Owners of damage parcels Nos. 39, 40 and 43 join in the city’s motion to confirm the awards made for those parcels. With reference to damage parcel 40, the *718application is that the award be paid to William. Heinmann instead of Louise Heinmann, the name stated in the report. The city has investigated this matter and consents that the order so provide, as William Heinmann is the real owner. The order may contain such a provision.
The only objections to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Griffin v. Mayor of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Livingston v. MayorCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831
- Ranck v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Genet v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- King v. Minneapolis Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Binghamton v. TaftNew York Supreme Court · 1925
- In re the Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- In re Luzerne-Lake George County Highway, New York County Courts1932