Legal Opinion

Hackney v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1989No. 55880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMEONE, Senior Judge.

Movant, Anthony Hackney, appeals the order denying his Rule 29.15 motion. On April 28, 1987, movant was found guilty of robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action and unlawful use of a weapon. Movant was sentenced to twenty years for the robbery, a consecutive fifteen years for armed criminal action and a concurrent ten year term for unlawful use of a weapon. Movant’s convictions were affirmed in State v. Hackney, 750 S.W.2d 621 (Mo.App. 1988).

On June 7, 1988, movant filed a pro se Rule 29.15 motion alleging nine grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. On…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Armour v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kluck v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. State v. TheusMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. State v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Anthony Hackney v. Bill Armontrout William WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API