Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Pinellas Kennel Club, Inc. v. State Racing Commission

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 7, 1934PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Relator filed an application for a racing permit under Chapter 14832, Acts 1931. The permit was' denied, and mandamus has been applied for on the theory that the granting of permits when applications are made in proper form, is a non-discretionary mandatory duty on the part of the State Racing Commission under Chapter 14832, supra.

In the present case the Court is of the opinion that no sufficient legal cause for denial of the permit has been made to appear conceding arguendo that the claimed discretion on the part of the State Racing Commission to deny permits, under certain circumstances,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex. rel. Wolfe v. KirkeSupreme Court of Florida · 1868
  2. State ex rel. Fowler v. FinleySupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  3. State Ex Rel. Tullidge v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. De Groot v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. Allen v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. West Flagler Amusement Co. v. State Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. State Ex Rel. Mason v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. West Flagler Amusement Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API