Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bohm v. Titus (In Re Titus)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 29, 2012No. 19-20413PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Related to Doc. Nos. 41, 45, 67, 108

BERNARD MARKOVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge.

The opinion that follows is the second in a line of decisions rendered by the Court to deal with fraudulent transfer actions and related matters that have been brought against several preeminent members of the now-disbanded law firm of Titus & McConomy. The first such decision was handed down in In re Arbogast, 466 B.R. 287 (Bankr.W.D.Pa.2012). Much of the analysis contained in the following opinion mirrors that set forth in Arbogast, but, as one can see, there are significant differences between the two…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Cadle Co. v. Mims (In Re Moore)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  3. Williams v. Marlar (In Re Marlar)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  4. Gens v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. Daugherty v. Central Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shearer v. Titus (In Re Titus)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  2. Shearer v. Oberdick (In re Oberdick)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Cohen v. SikiricaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Carr v. Loeser (In re International Auction & Appraisal Services LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Shearer v. Titus (In re Titus)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API