Legal Opinion

People v. Lapidus

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1911No. Docket No. 118PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Exceptions before sentence from Ottawa; Padgham, J. Bennie Lapidus was convicted of larceny.

1Opinion of the CourtBkooke, J.

Respondent, who was convicted of larceny in a store in the daytime, brings his case to this court for review upon exceptions before sentence.

It appears from the record that respondent entered the clothing store of the Lokker-Rutgers Company, in the city of Holland, at about the noon hour. The establishment seems to be a large one; some eight clerks being employed. Respondent went up to a counter behind which stood a clerk, and announced a desire to purchase a pair of pants of a particular size and color. The clerk selected a pair, neither of the size nor color required, and displayed them to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WakelyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. People v. LonsdaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. People v. HessMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. People v. RanneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. People v. JacksMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. GoddardMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. LombardoMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. People v. EdingMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. People v. PetropoulaposMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. People v. DowdMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API