People v. Jacks
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Muskegon. (Dicker-man, J.) Respondent was convicted of larceny. The facts, and the points of counsel. passed upon by the Court, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.
The respondent in this case was tried in the Muskegon circuit court upon an information charging him in the first count with the larceny of household goods to the value of $68, and in the second count with receiving the same household goods knowing them to have been stolen, and was convicted of the larceny of the goods to the value of $17.50. The case is now before us for review on exceptions before judgment.
The information alleged the ownership of the property in Peter Walker.
The respondent was at the time of his arrest acting in the capacity of United States deputy-marshal, and had also…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. JennesMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
- Coleman v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- State v. MoreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. MarchMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
- George v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
- People v. RichMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. MinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Luther M. Powell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.