Legal Opinion

Packard Motor Car Co. v. Overland Motor Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 11, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEIGER, District Judge.

The case is before the court upon the plaintiffs’ motion for an injunction pendente lite upon a supplemental bill. Upon the original bill the case was heard by the District Court, and the issues involved the validity and infringement of claims 9, 11, and 18 of the patent. From the decree entered April 10, 1924, pursuant to an opinion filed the preceding March 22d (297 F. 474), an appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals was immediately taken. On March 2, 1925, that court reversed the judgment, with directions to dismiss the bill; the ground being the laches of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Overland Motor Co. v. Packard Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Lovell v. Seybold Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  3. Elvin Mechanical Stoker Co. v. Locomotive Stoker Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
  4. Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co. v. Pennsylvania Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1908
  5. Packard Motor Car Co. v. Overland Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co. v. Worth Featherweight Pen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  2. Johnson Bros. Engineering Corp. v. Caille Bros.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1934
  3. Overland Motor Co. v. Packard Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1929
  4. Hemlani v. HemlaniSuperior Court of Guam · 2012
  5. Selig v. Niagara Recovery Solutions Management Group LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API