Commerce Acceptance of Oklahoma City, Inc. v. Henderson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
Plaintiff in error, as alleged assignee and holder in due course, sued defendants in error for the balance due upon a note. Defendants denied execution of any note such as that sued upon, and further plead failure of consideration, fraud and misrepresentation. A jury trial resulted in a verdict for defendants, upon which the judgment appealed from was rendered.
The petition alleged defendants’ execution and delivery of their note for $660.96 to Superior Products, Inc. on January 30, 1961, assignment of this note to plaintiff, defendants’ subsequent default and failure to pay…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peoples Bank of Aurora v. HaarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Delk v. City Nat. Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Producers' Nat. Bank v. ElrodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- James Talcott, Inc. v. FinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Selected Investments Corporation v. LesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Geiger Finance Co. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Walls v. Morris Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973