Legal Opinion

Thorpe Electric Supply, Inc. v. Shannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 16, 1986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In this action to recover $11,063.24 allegedly owed to plaintiff by defendant for goods sold to defendant, we find that Special Term correctly denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. As both parties have noted, summary judgment is a drastic remedy which should be granted only when there is no doubt as to the absence of a triable issue of fact (Phillips v Kantor & Co., 31 NY2d 307, 311; Alfano v First Natl. Bank, 111 AD2d 960, 962). While a question certainly has been raised as to defendant’s credibility, arising from certain statements made in his affidavit, we are nevertheless…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Joseph Kantor & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Alfano v. First National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Davis Acoustical Corp. v. Matzen Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marzotto v. Filene's Basement, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API