Dawley v. Brown

—On the argument of the appeal the respondent contended, that the appellant was estopped from assailing the validity of the conveyancé made by the referee to Johnson, for the reason that he had, for a period of years, acquiesced in the judgment which determined that the deed from Dawley to Oulver was fraudulent and void as against Johnson’s judgment. This point was not discussed or referred to in the written opinion accompanying the order reversing the judgment. We think the argument in support of the proposition stated, is unsound and is not sustained by authority or the legal principles…