Legal Opinion

United States v. Minyen

U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided December 23, 2002No. CGCMS 24233; Docket No. 1172PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAHILL, Judge:

Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, Appellant entered pleas of guilty to two specifications of unauthorized absence in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 886 and one specification of missing movement by neglect in violation of Article 87, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 887. The charges were based on two separate absences, one of approximately four and a half months and one of over eight months, over a fifteen-month period. The military judge accepted Appellant’s pleas, and pursuant to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  2. United States v. PierceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. GammonsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  4. United States v. GundersonU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  5. United States v. RimmerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. YangerU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
  2. United States v. GormleyU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
  3. United States v. HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2019
  4. United States v. YangerU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
  5. United States v. YangerU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API