Legal Opinion

United States v. Rimmer

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided May 17, 1994No. ACMR 9301400PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Pursuant to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of absence without leave, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 886 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for four months, and reduction to Private El.

The appellant asserts that the military judge committed prejudicial error during the sentencing portion of the court-martial when he admitted, over defense objection, a DA Form 2627, Record of…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  2. United States v. SuzukiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. NegroneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  4. United States v. DykeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. WilliamsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. MinyenU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  2. United States v. BuenaventuraU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  3. United States v. GoddenUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  4. United States v. MinyenU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API