Legal Opinion
Falconer v. Penn Maritime, Inc.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided October 25, 2005No. CIV.05-42-B-WPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
Defendant filed a motion in limine to preclude the introduction of the marine casualty investigation report into evidence and to prevent the Plaintiff from referring to OSHA violations as establishing negligence per se. Defendant also argues that post-accident evidence is inadmissible pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 407. Finally, Defendant requests that Plaintiff be barred, pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 702 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 26, from questioning Defendant’s experts about topics beyond areas of expertise. 1 This Court grants Defendant’s motions regarding the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Arizona v. RumseySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kernan v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Eternity Shipping, Ltd., Eurocarriers, SaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Miller v. Pacific Trawlers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Johnson v. Horizon Lines, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Guest v. Carnival Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
- Carney v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.