J.A.O. Acquisition Corp. v. Stavitsky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*390Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered October 8, 2004, which denied defendant W. Paul Brogowski’s motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the eighteenth cause of action in plaintiffs’ second amended complaint, unanimously reversed, ■ with costs, partial summary judgment granted, and the eighteenth cause of action dismissed.
Plaintiffs J.A.O. Acquisition Corp., J.A.O. Holding Company, Inc. (collectively referred to as JAO) and D.B. Brown, Inc., in their eighteenth cause of action contained in JAO’s second amended complaint, contend that defendant W Paul…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Gilbert Frank Corp. v. Federal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Swersky v. Dreyer & TraubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Megaris Furs, Inc. v. Gimbel Brothers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Brunetti v. MusallamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Global Minerals & Metals Corp. v. HolmeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Brown v. Wolf Group Integrated Communications, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Kavner v. GellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Ramos v. RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Banushi v. Law Office of Scott W. EpsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.