Barry v. Reading Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Dissent
BIGGS, Circuit Judge (dissenting).
The plaintiff is the widow and executrix of Ralph E. Barry. Barry, a brakeman employed by the defendant railroad at its yard at Rutherford, Pennsylvania, was injured while “humping” a gondola car down the railroad yard and died as a result of his injuries. The provisions of Sections 2 and 3 of the Safety Appliance Act, 45 U.S.C.A. Sections 11 and 12, are applicable to the appliances on the car on which Barry was riding at the time of the accident. There is evidence (to be dealt with hereinafter) from which the jury might have found that the car had a hand…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. WagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- St. Joseph & Grand Island Railway Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Davis v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.