Legal Opinion

Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v. Reynaud

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

The final account of the trustee of a voluntary trust created inter vivos in 1899 has been surcharged by the referee with respect to three items: (1) Loss resulting from the alleged negligent retention of certain bonds; (2) unexplained payment of a sum of money to the settlor; (3) a payment to a firm of accountants for services performed in connection with the preparation of the final account. The settlor of the trust died in 1916.

I. The non-legal character of the securities did not cause their retention to be at the risk of the trustee. Negligence must be predicated on something more. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. King v. . TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. In Re the Accounting of Fulton Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Costello v. . CostelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Purdy v. . LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. In re the Estate of ParsonsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BalfeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  2. Katsaros v. CodyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1983
  3. Boland v. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  4. In re the Accounting of McMillanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  5. In re the Estate of BowneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API